"...if anyone makes the assistance of grace depend on the humility or obedience of man and does not agree that it is a gift of grace itself that we are obedient and humble, he contradicts the Apostle who says, "What have you that you did not receive?" (1 Cor. 4:7), and, "But by the grace of God I am what I am" (1 Cor. 15:10). (Council of Orange: Canon 6)


  • Rev. John Samson
  • Rev. David Thommen (URC)
  • John Hendryx
  • Marco Gonzalez

    We are a community of confessing believers who love the gospel of Jesus Christ, affirm the Biblical and Christ-exalting truths of the Reformation such as the five solas, the doctrines of grace, monergistic regeneration, and the redemptive historical approach to interpreting the Scriptures.


    Community Websites

    Monergism Books on Facebook


    Latest Posts



    Ministry Links

  • « Studies in John (Lesson 14: Golgotha) | Main | Justification - Paul and James Easily Reconciled »

    Evangelical Zionism

    A rather disturbing trend among some evangelical groups in the past decade is the rise of Christian Zionism. Among those who are among their number there are some radical elements which think that they can help hasten the Apocalypse by means of forcing the fulfillment of prophesy. This, they believe, can be done by helping Orthodox Jews to raise red heifers and assist in rebuilding the Temple that was destroyed by the Romans in the first century in Jerusalem. Several evangelical groups are actually raising and shipping red heifers to Israel in the belief that the birth of a red heifer in Israel will signal the rebuilding of the Temple.

    A cattle rancher and ordained minister with the National Pentecostal Assemblies of Jesus Christ, Clyde Lott believes, like many dispensationalists, that three preconditions mentioned in the Bible are necessary for the coming of the Messiah: the state of Israel must be restored; Jerusalem must be in Jewish hands; and the Temple, last destroyed in 70 A.D., must be rebuilt. The modern state of Israel, of course, was established in 1948, and since 1967, the Jewish state has controlled all of Jerusalem. That leaves the rebuilding of the Temple, and since a red heifer was part of the sacrificial ritual in the Temple -- mentioned several times in the Bible, including in the Book of Numbers, chapters 19-22 -- many believe the birth of a red heifer in Israel will signal the Temple's return. Many Jews believe that the same preconditions will bring about the coming of the Jewish Messiah.

    At least two other American Christians are breeding similar cows in the United States in hopes of bringing them to Israel, according to Gershon Solomon, the leader of the Temple Mount Faithful, another group dedicated to rebuilding the Temple.

    Two major problems with this action by Christians should be self-evident to those who frequently read the Bible:

    1) God has never called us to pry into His secret will or try to bring about the fulfillment of prophesy through attempting, by force, to bring about the end of the world. God will bring about the eschaton in His own time, according to His sovereign good pleasure. He calls Christians, rather, to preach the gospel and to act in justice, mercy. love and humility. There is no place for Christians to speculate about the end times and attempt to bring it about by their own efforts. There is no command of God to do so and we should focus on the gospel rather than spend all our effort on the secular state of Israel.

    2) I can hardly think of anything more blasphemous than for persons (claiming to be Christians) to be raising red heifers or helping rebuild the Temple. To do so is to go backwards in redemptive history and to fail to heed to warnings listed in Hebrews 6 & 10. The book of Hebrews is about Jesus Christ and his superiority to Angels, to Moses and to the ritual Levitical Sacrifice. The warnings in Hebrews were specifically geared toward those Jewish Christians who were tempted to go back to the shadows of the levitical sacrifices instead of trusting in Christ alone, who the sacrifices themselves pointed to. To return to the sacrifices is simply to deny Jesus Christ by exalting the shadows, and this is accompanied with the severest warnings. Perhaps these evangelicals are "well-meaning" but good intent will not take the place of obedience. Jesus Himself said that if the Temple were destroyed he would rebuild it in three days. This was in reference to His resurrected body, so Jesus Himself made clear that he was the True Temple.

    In his new book, Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics, author Graeme Goldsworthy also sets aside a few paragraphs to expose this dangerous error which he calls "Literalism: evangelical Zionism":

    "...For evangelicals, one of the areas of greatest concern is in the interpretation of prophesy in the Old Testament. Thus literalists claim to take to promises concerning the restoration of Israel, Jerusalem and the temple at their literal face value. What can be wrong with that? Well, for a start, determining what the literal meaning is can be problematic. The prophets of Israel has a preference for the use of non-literal language, for poetic imagery, symbolism and metaphor, and it can sometimes be difficult to establish the literal meaning. When we add to this the fact that different prophetic texts may describe the same future event with extremely different and sometimes incompatible imagery, the problem is compounded. Although only a small number of examples occur in the Bible, apocalyptic symbolism presents even greater challenges.

    It could be argued that, though the details may be hard to pin down because of the prophetic preference for poetic imagery and metaphor, the big picture is abundantly clear. On this basis the literalist asserts that God reveals through the prophets that his kingdom comes with the return of the Jews to Palestine, the rebuilding of Jerusalem, and the restoration of the temple along with all its Old Testament ministries. Evangelical Christians who take this approach share some significant convictions with modern Jewish Zionists regarding the restoration of Jerusalem as the centre of the messianic kingdom. Of course, they differ radically over the identity of the Messiah.

    The New Testament clearly does not support such a simplistic hermeneutic as literal fulfillment of prophesy. In this kind of Zionism we face the problem with the New Testament seems to be completely indifferent to the restorations referred to. In fact, one great hermeneutic divide that separated Jesus from the unbelieving Jews concerned this very issue of prophetic fulfillment. The Jews of Jesus' day entertained a certain kind of literalism. They also claimed their pedigree through Abraham and Moses, but Jesus refuted this claim because they did not believe in Him. That the Old Testament Scriptures are, as He says, about him (JOhn 5:39-47; 8:39-47, 56-58) must seriously qualify literalism, since Jesus (as Jesus) is not literally in the Old Testament. The disciples of Jesus also needed a lesson in the application of the Old Testament to Christ (Luke 24:25-27, 44-45; Acts 1:6-8). When the message got through under the power of the Holy Spirit, the apostolic preachers never varied from the new conviction that the hermeneutical principle was the gospel, not literalism. This means that the terminology of the Old Testament could only be understood Christologically. How can John the Baptist be literally Elijah (Matt 17:12-13)? If the promise to David in 2 Samuel 7:12-16 is fulfilled according to any normal use of the word 'literal'. If, as Paul says, the resurrection of Jesus is the fulfillment of the promises of God to Israel (Acts 13:29-32) then literalism cannot be sustained. If, according to Hebrews 12:18-24, the Jewish Christians have already come to 'Mount Zion and to the city of the living God' through faith in Jesus Christ, this is the only Zion that matters. Because Jesus is an historical figure, an Israelite who has come in the flesh, he indeed fulfils some prophesies in a rather literal way. Thus the Messiah is born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2), and is born of a virgin (Isa 7:14, Matt 1:22-23). But this does not establish literalism as the basic hermeneutic. The gospel requires that we allow Christ to be the hermeneutic principle.

    Evangelical prophetic literalism is an exercise in interpreting the New Testament by the application of supposed literal meaning of the Old Testament. If the gospel is our hermeneutic norm, then while it is true that the interpretation of the New needs and understanding of the Old, the principal emphasis is on the way the gospel and the New Testament as a whole interpret everything, including the Old Testament. The literalist must become a futurist, since a literalistic fulfillment of all Old Testament prophesy has not yet taken place. Christian Zionism not only reshapes the New Testament view of the future, but also affects the present period in which such a future is anticipated. It affects the way many Christians view the respective rights of Palestinians and Israelis to live in 'the promised land'. Yet one does not have to be a Zionist to appreciate Paul's emphasis on God's method of salvation, in that the gospel is 'to the Jew first'. That perspective is maintained in the New Testament, while the notion of the restoration of the temple and Jerusalem in Palestine is uniformly absent.

    J.W. Hendryx

    Further Reading
    Forcing the End
    Christian Zionism by Stephen Sizer

    Posted by John on April 2, 2007 02:00 PM



    thank you for this post today!

    Just this morning, in the regular, five days a week, 7 a.m. morning men's meeting, I was saying to those present of yesterday's preaching that I felt so convicted of unbelief as the Preacher was reading from Luke's gospel Chapter 24 and showing with the Scripture that everyone by their actions about the body of Jesus, Mary Mag, Joseph of Ari, Peter and John, the two on their spa walk to Emmasus, were living still in "natural heart felt unbelief" until Jesus "showed up" showing Himself "alive" and then they saw the Holy Temple, raised up from their day living and eating among them as before!

    Even then, I/They, with joy, were astonished in unbelief!

    Luk 24:41 And while they still disbelieved for joy and were marveling, he said to them, "Have you anything here to eat?"

    hmmmmmm, I realized two things were happening simultaneously while sitting there listening to the Preaching of the Word, unbelief was being destroyed by God's FAITH imparted by the Preaching of the Word, so my eyes were opened to see my unbelief still exists even though I have already had many convincing proofs over the last 30 years!

    I am utterly convinced if I don't hear Jesus today say to me this:

    Luk 24:25 And he said to them, "O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken!
    Luk 24:26 Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into his glory?"

    I then have died and am now passed into His Glory and reward: LIFE FOREVERMORE purchased for me too!

    What a mystery it is!

    I have been to Israel. I have talked with some there holding to the beliefs your post points too hereon!

    If He does not work His Word into my life today and open up the Scriptures to me, I will simply be devoid of the Word!

    Now I, though, as you, have utter deep excitment in Him as we are beckoned into His Word and Work for His GLORY as we sojourn through on this side of His Glory!

    Now I pray on this side of His Glory: "THY KINGDOM COME, THY WILL BE DONE!"


    i always appreciate such articles. For many years i had struggled with the futurist interpretation of Scripture.
    Too many things in history proved to be fulfillment of prophecies that it would seem superfluous, and somewhat blasphemous against Christ, to have them "fulfilled again and again" in the future.
    Also, when one looks at the Old Testament through the Gospel of Jesus Christ, so many prophecies become much clearer.

    "the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy."
    Revelation 19:10

    Thanks for your ministry!

    Brother John

    this morning this came to me after pondering your post of yesterday and the deep meaning, that nowhere in 1 Chronicles 22 is this a "word" from God LEADING DAVID TO DO THOSE THINGS, rather it is a man's justification of self, DAVID'S? Maybe I could say this rightly as I see myself easily do naturally similarly, a kinda self justification, after I have sinned as a natural reaction and unwittingly something I do to appease my conscience even though I have again received absolution?

    Wouldn't it be fair to say that this chapter chartered the events we now see playing out there in Jerusalem in these days?

    We know, because it is clear to us by Jesus, that it is JESUS CHRIST and not son Solomon who is building the CHURCH, THE HOLY DWELLING PLACES OF THE MOST HIGH where He will dwell forevermore?

    IT IS THIS "NEW" JERUSALEM THAT SHALL COME DOWN FROM HEAVEN ONE DAY and not what has now become the eventuality of CHAPTER 22 of 1 Chronicles, a total confusing mess?

    Any insights or thoughts you would want to share about this?

    Post a comment

    Please enter the letter "r" in the field below: